Dear Readers,
Events have been healing up geo-politically.
With Pakistan declared by the US "not responsible"
enough to be included in the nuclear club, the US-India
nuclear deal itself is far from consummation. While
the Bush Administration is determined to force the
deal through Congress, and has the numbers to do so,
it will have to accept some amendments to get the
nay-sayers from its own Republican Party on board.
On the other hand India has categorically stated that
it will not accept any amendments. There are also
signs that there is double-think going on in Indian
minds about the efficacy of the deal, both because
of the widespread domestic dissent as well as the
negative reaction from India's traditional friends,
particularly Russia. In the meantime Iran's nuclear
ambitions continue to occupy international center-stage,
with the US hurling threats and Iran replying in kind.
The danger is that Israel may decide the "casus
belli" exists after the Iranian President's statement
promising to "wipe Israel from the face of this
Earth". If Israel decides to go it alone, it
doesn't have the resources to go after all the Iranian
nuclear sites. US may be forced to join in to ensure
all the sites are eliminated. Given the range of skimpy
pretexts being used in the approach to war, Pakistan
falls very much in the danger zone and should get
its guard up. Back-door diplomacy may yet avert war,
given Ahmedinejad's recent letter to Bush, the first
Iran-US communication at that level in 27 years. While
the content, tone and tenor are still unclear and
the White House has been dismissive in its first reaction,
there is a glimmer of hope. For the benefit of readers,
I am re-producing my article, "US-Iran, Israel,
India - and Pakistan".
On June 7, 1981, Israeli F-15s and F-16s took off
from Etzion airbase near Eilat at 4:00 pm, at 5:35
pm, in an action lasting less than 80 seconds, the
nuclear reactor at Osirik being built with French
assistance was left in ruins. Osirik would have given
Saddam Hussain an Iraqi bomb in less than 10 years.
After the Osirik raid, nations, (among them India,
Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, South Africa, etc) developing
nuclear weapons through clandestine means dispersed
their nuclear facilities and buried them deep in secret
locations, making it all that much harder for an Osirik-type
"solution". On the other hand the development
of Stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, precision-guided
bombs, remotely-piloted aerial vehicles, extremely
accurate GIS maps, etc gives a potential attacker
numerous options, many of them already field-tested
in battle in the last 15 years. During the Iraq war
the US used covert means, viz (1) extremely successfully
in buying off the loyalties of key Iraqi generals
so that organized resistance collapsed in the face
of the US Blitzkrieg and (2) not so successfully in
activating domestic Iraqi resistance (e.g. Washington-based
Chalabi) to cause Saddam Hussain any real damage.
Despite relentless diplomatic efforts to head off
a possible war, it is only a question of "when".
The US has learnt many lessons from going it alone
in Iraq, particularly in not letting diplomatic action
to run its full course. Israel has never been inhibited
by any such qualms and/or restrictions. Osirik compromised
and endangered Israeli security, they had to take
it out and they did. Facing strong condemnation from
all over the world, Israel had no regrets, equating
most of it as hypocrisy by EU countries since many
were privately grateful.
The US-led condemnation of Iran has manifold objectives,
among them, viz (1) creating international pressure
on Iran to scale down its nuclear program or maybe
even abandoning it "without bloodying swords",
to quote Sun Tse Tzu (2) creating a favourable world
coalition supporting possible military action against
Iran if necessary and (3) to head off imminent possible
Israeli action against Iran, and if it does happen
and the US is forced to be a participant in the fait
accompli as a necessary bitter pill, to soften world
approbation.
Despite the sabre-rattling, US military action against
Iran is not a done thing if the decision was Washington's
alone. Overstretched in (and because of) Iraq the
US Armed Forces could suffer grievously both in Iraq
and Iran. The preferred attack mode will be an air
assault, a combination of B-2 Stealth Bombers, F-117
Stealth Fighters, B-52s, Tomahawk cruise missiles,
etc, any mode that can deliver Joint Direct Action
Munitions (J-DAMs) taking out multiple targets in
deep concrete bunkers. A CIA unit already seems to
be operating in Sistan Balochistan Province stirring
up Iranian Baloch tribes, does this strike any chord
about the incentive and support keeping Akbar Bugti
in the hills? The Iraqi-based Mujhahideen-e-Khalq
(MEK) operating against Iran with Saddam Hussain's
help had been disarmed, the Pentagon is believed to
be seeking MEK's re-activation. Even though liberals
may not be enamoured by President Ahmedinijad or his
government, Iranians are very nationalistic, on the
nuclear issue they are united and charged, the regime
change option will not materialize. The Iranian regime
has put the threatened US invasion to good use, uniting
Iranians on one pro-nuclear platform.
With increasing number of Americans wanting US troops
out of Iraq, can the Republican President risk another
war, given that both Iraq and Afghanistan seem to
be proverbial "black holes"? Condemnation
of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfield's conduct of
the Iraq war by six retired generals, some recently
serving as Divisional Commanders in Iraq, was extremely
damaging for the Bush Administration. The political
risk will exponentially be higher with elections for
the US Senate and House of Representatives due this
November. Unlike common perception the US will not
rush into war. There are confirmed reports about diplomatic
back-channel talks, an aide to Iran's nuclear chief
was believed to be in Washington talking to US officials.
The "Holocaust" exercises strong influence
over the Israeli psyche, "never again" is
an Israeli article of faith. When an Iranian aircraft
lightly damaged the Osirik reactor in 1980 during
the Iran-Iraq war, the Iraqis stated that the proposed
bomb was not meant for Iran or muslims but for Israelis.
Enough for Israel to trigger plans for the Osirik
raid! Recently Iran's President Ahmedinijad has said
Israel will be wiped out from the face of the Earth,
for Israel that amounts to "casus belli".
Contrary to world perception the US does not exercise
inordinate influence over Israeli decision-making,
at best there is close consultation on many issues.
John Locke's (1734-1802) "Second Treatise"
seems to be the Israeli inspiration (and now also
of Bush's National Security Strategy) of pre-emptive
action. Locke's tenets state, to quote, "there
cannot exist a doubt, that, if that formidable potentate
certainly entertains designs of oppression and conquest,
the other States have a right to anticipate him",
unquote, or in other words, to act before "it
is too late, and the evil is past care".
In December 2005, just before he went into coma, Sharon
authorized an action plan for Iran to be ready by
end of March 2006, activating two units, Unit 262
of the Israeli Defence Forces (IDFs) the equivalent
of US Special Forces and 69 Squadron consisting of
F-15s, the main weapon platform for the 1981 Osirik
raid. The question is not whether Israel will act
or not, it is whether Israel will act alone and when,
the 29 TOR anti-missile systems worth US$700 million
on order from Russia will expedite the decision. Able
only to deploy aircraft as delivery weapons, Israel
lacks the capability of carrying out a comprehensive
surgical strike over nearly two dozen Iranian nuclear
sites. The US may be forced into the conflict despite
its own reservations and political compulsions. Commando
(and even bombing) raids by Israel could virtually
be suicide missions but a nation that has grown up
with a Masada-psyche should know a thing or two why
a "suicide bomber" becomes one. One stray
incongruous coincidence requires mention here, Col
Ilan Ramon of the Israeli Air Force took part in the
June 7, 1981 Osirik raid as a young F-16 pilot, he
died aboard the "Columbia" space shuttle
on Feb1, 2003, the debris spreading over, of all the
places, the town of Palestine in Texas.
Skeptics may consider it ludicrous, there is an outside
danger Pakistan may even become a simultaneous target.
Reputed analyst Eric Margolis says that Pakistan is
definitely on the US agenda after Iran. Could Israeli
(or US) planners afford the risk of leaving a muslim
nuclear State with the means of missile delivery intact
if there is war with Iran? The tragedy would be they
have no grouse with Pakistan, can they take this calculated
risk in the face of possible Pakistani nuclear reaction
because of military action on a fellow muslim nation
and neighbour in line with the 1837 "Caroline
formula", to quote "necessity of self-defence
is instant, overwhelming and leaves no choice of means
and no moment of deliberation"?, unquote. Given
the deliberate ambiguity of Indian PM Manmohan Singh's
pointed statement to a muslim delegation, "India
cannot afford another nuclear State in its neighborhood",
should one not be apprehensive that India as the "newly
US-appointed policeman of the region", takes
the opportunity for a "final solution" vis-à-vis
Pakistan putting into effect "Cold Start"?
Our US ally has pointedly (and quite brusquely) excluded
us from the nuclear club, after all we are not as
"responsible" as India. Without going to
panic stations, one must take deterrent measures to
deter any temptation to line up Pakistan in cross-sights
as a target of opportunity to be dealt with sooner
rather than later. Hoping (and praying) otherwise,
we need to take prudent precautions.
M.
Ikram Sehgal