
Publisher & Managing Editor:
Ikram-ul-Majeed Sehgal
Chief Patron
Air Marshal (Retd)
Mohammad Asghar Khan
Patrons
Lt Gen (Retd) SF Lodi
Brig (Retd)TH Siddiqi
Lt Gen (Retd) Imtiaz Waraich
Board of Editorial Advisors
Ardeshir Cowasjee
Arif Nizami
Ms Maleeha Lodhi
Ms Nasim Zehra
Hameed Haroon
Humayun Gauhar
Ambassador (Retd) Afzal Mahmood
Panel of Contributing Editors
Air Marshal (Retd) Ayaz A. Khan
Vice Adm (Retd) IF Quadir
Dr Shireen Mazari
Farhan Bokhari
Panel of Columnists
Col (Retd) EAS Bokhari
Col (Retd) Abdul Qayyum
Dr. Matiur Rahman
Ms Amina Jilani
Capt (Retd) A.A. Jilani
Executive Editor
Ms Ambreen Jahangir
Vice President Marketing
Imran N. Ahmed
Asst. Vice President Marketing
Syed Tauseef Muhammad Ali
Advertising Manager
Naushad Alam
Advertising Manager-Globe
Syed Shehzad Ali
Advertising Manager-Social Pages
Muhammad Azfar Ahsan
Internet Coordinator
Rizwan Alam Khan
Art Director
Junaid Rafiq
Graphics Designer
Rizwan Alam Khan
Cover Design
Rizwan Alam Khan
Manager (Admin & Accounts)
Ms Parveen Akhtar
Printing Manager
Tariq Jamal
Advertisement Representative (Lahore)
Muhammad Yousuf
Tel: 042-6314413
Fax: 042-6375939
Advertisement Manager (Islamabad)
Raashid Kamal
Creative Publicity is handled by
DYNAVIS (Pvt) Ltd
Tel 5861637, 5830582, 5863920 Fax:(021) 5863924
Lahore (042) 6360236
Islamabad (051) 277683, 815168
|
From the Desk of the
Publisher |
and Managing Editor |
Dear Readers,
October has been a momentous month for
Pakistan. The former PM, Mian Nawaz Sharif, tried to do a civilian coup by dismissing the
Chairman JCSC and COAS Pakistan Army, Gen Pervez Musharraf, while he was abroad. In a
swift counter-coup the Army did a bloodless turnaround. Lt Gen Ziauddin, the then DG ISI,
who was appointed to succeed Gen Musharraf, failed where it most counted, in facing off
the troops like any officer of a fighting arm would have done in similar circumstances.
Without formal declaration of Martial Law, we went under military rule. There are some
very fine articles here, one by Ms Nasim Zehra as the cover story and the other by Lt Gen
(Retd) Sardar FS Lodi, among others. I wrote an article for THE NATION on October 23, 1999
entitled OPPORTUNITY OF A LIFE TIME, which I am reproducing below.
As Muslims we live with the strong
belief that whatever happens to man is ordained by God, given the bizarre events of Oct
12, 1999 destiny has thus blessed Gen Pervez Musharraf and his colleagues, who now have a
God-given chance to do good by this nation. Frankly one envies them this opportunity of a
lifetime to correct the many wrongs in this country, to set this great nation firmly on
the road to prosperity in the new millennium. At the turn of the century, our new military
rulers stand unequivocally at the crossroads of destiny, where will they take us? Will
they rise above themselves to secure the nation's future or wallow in the type of petty
selfishness and greed that has brought this nation symbolically to its knees? Going by Gen
Musharraf's address to the nation, lightning seems to have struck him. A keen student of
history, his message was to the point and carefully crafted, more important his body
language was sincere.
The military hierarchy cannot make any
excuses for inexperience, they have 3 distinct periods of military rule, almost 22-23
years of the 50 or so years since independence, to have learnt lessons from, they should
be clearly able to distinguish right from wrong in the matter of governance of a nation.
Over the years much emphasis has been given in the military to all-round knowledge, the
present crop of generals is better educated than their predecessors, moreover military
culture inculcates constant self-analysis. Plans for the country should thus be based on
logic as well as pragmatism, spelling out clear aims and objectives. The Chief
Executive's readiness to declare his assets is by itself a momentous event; it sets a
fine precedent for the future.
On Oct 12, 1999 circumstances were
engineered that would have split the Army leading to possible civil war. That would have
spelt doom for Pakistan as the country fragmented, first among warlords and then on ethnic
and sectarian lines, a sure recipe for anarchy. Only 2 days earlier, in a news analysis
for THE NATION entitled 'THE ARMY AND DISCIPLINE', we had warned that the difference
between a mob and an Army was discipline and there was no substitute to the authority of
the COAS, he was head honcho. In the vacuum that ensued because of the former PM's
October madness, does the military have any real legal need to justify their existence at
the helm of governance of the nation? All this talk about constitutional lacuna is pure
nonsense. What should they have done in the face of economic and political apocalypse,
allowed more of the same to take over? The civil war scenario and the governance of the
elected representatives that brought this country to this sorry pass justified the means
that brought an end to so-called 'democratic rule'. In the circumstances it was shocking
to learn about the Jadoogars of the world flocking to Pindi to render legal advice about
surmounting (or circumventing) the 'constitutional lacuna'. Let's be clear about it. No
constitution in the world can make military rule legal, similarly no law recognises the
individual's right to take another's life, unless it is in self-defence or sudden grave
provocation. So what does one do when a constitutional government goes berserk, in whom
does the concept of 'lawful command' rest? The Army has taken an oath to guard the
integrity and sovereignty of the country 'even to the peril of the lives'; their
conscience should be satisfied that they acted under the concept of the doctrine of
necessity. The bloodless counter-coup by the Army did not bring even a semblance of
protest from the masses from any part of the country, that deafening silence giving the
Army the legality it needs, sovereignty is vested ultimately in the people. No
constitutional cover is necessary. The acid test of this military rule will lie in the
sincerity of its leaders, in the maintenance of their primary aim they have proclaimed,
restoration of the rule of law as envisaged in our religion and by our forefathers, most
importantly the Quaid, and in the application of that law evenly to all the citizens of
the State. As a constant critic generally of absolute rule and despite our history of the
many unkept promises, one sees reason for hope.
The major thing wrong with the economy
is the lack of government revenues. Fiscal deficit has to be made up with borrowing, that
puts us deeper in trouble. To shore up the fiscal base, we have to immediately generate
revenues, viz. (1) make people pay their due taxes and (2) make loan defaulters to return
their debts. This will tide us over for a couple of years, enough for the new revenue
cycle to kick in. The third part of the exercise may be more long term, the return of
ill-gotten wealth, locally and from abroad. Obviously all this falls within the purview of
accountability which must be free and fair and across the board to include politicians,
bureaucrats and also uniformed personnel, both serving and retired, as well as business
and industrialists who may have illegally profited, whether it be under-invoicing or over,
transfer of illegal wealth abroad, kickbacks or commission on projects or defence
purchases, etc. Laws must be enacted to ensure people do not escape on technical grounds.
As far as the present regime is concerned, the crunch will come in the matter of
commissions against military purchases. Undeclared commissions are illegal and a fair
number of the agents are retired servicemen. There is also the danger of jealousy and
spite, it is so rampant in this country that the military hierarchy must always guard
against those misusing their authority for personal vendetta or personal gain. Those
indulging in making false accusations or bearing false witness must be liable to the same
punishment as those they accuse i.e. if their accusations/witness are proved false. There
is a tendency among our people to subvert the system by using it for their own selfish,
material reasons, will the military be able to avoid that pressure?
All Defence Services officers take an
oath to die for the nation if need be. In the narrow sense of the Constitution, no one can
justify military rule but what is the paper the Constitution is written on worth if there
is no country for the Constitution to be exercised in? One may not agree with the Chief
Executive on any number of counts but there is no doubt he is decisive, and he has
convinced his colleagues and subordinates about his sincerity of purpose, the acid test of
leadership. His legal status will be derived from that moral authority, something he
exercises not only on behalf of a much-aggrieved nation but also in the pure sincerity of
his initiatives. As a soldier he should be fully prepared to answer for his actions once
his task is accomplished. Having the courage of his convictions, let him be judged once
accountability is complete and the essential reforms carried out. A referendum on the
regime's performance must be held simultaneously with the final electoral exercise which
will lead to the transfer of power to the elected representatives of the people. Would the
Supreme Court try Gen Musharraf and his colleagues in the face of a massive 'yes' vote
by the people in their favour? If the Chief Executive has been true to the aims spelt out
and accomplished what he had promised to deliver, no court in the world will ever dare to
try and convict him. And if they should so dare, the masses will lynch the members of that
particular court.
Gen Musharraf's predecessor rulers
before him failed because to various extents they compromised their moral authority by
selfish motivation and personal gain. They subverted their conscience for the sake of
individual ambition or personal vendetta or were simply overwhelmed by circumstances. We
have been fed for over 50 years with a staple diet of promises that have never been
redeemed. Even then the most hardened critic and/or cynic will give the Chief Executive
the benefit of doubt in the circumstances availing in the country. Gen Pervez Musharraf
has an opportunity of a lifetime to be loyal to the cause of what makes up this country,
its citizens. If that should happen, and being an incurable optimist one has every reason
to hope that it will, Pakistan has been blessed by Divine Providence going into the new
millennium.
|